Legal Opinion

E. M. Consumer Corp. v. Christensen

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 1, 1975No. Civ. 33436PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

KANE, J.

This is an appeal from the lower court’s judgment denying appellants’ petition for writ of mandate and declaring that the marketing order of respondent Director of Agriculture 1 of the State of California (“Director”) is constitutional and valid as applied to appellants. The background facts may be stated as follows:

On July 31, 1972, the Northern California Dairy Association requested the Director to hold a public hearing to review the minimum wholesale and retail prices of fluid milk sold in one gallon containers in specific marketing areas. 2 On September 27, 1972, hearing…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Strumsky v. San Diego County Employees Retirement Assn.California Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Pitts v. PerlussCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
  3. Ray v. ParkerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
  4. Brock v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
  5. Knudsen Creamery Co. v. BrockCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Golden Cheese Co. v. VossCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
  2. Straus Family Creamery v. LyonsDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2003
  3. Untitled California Attorney General Opinion, California Attorney General Reports1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API