Legal Opinion
Kendall v. United Air Lines, Inc.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided October 21, 1949No. Civ. Nos. 47-501, 48-185PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BONDY, District Judge.
The objection to interrogatory 99 propounded to James Edwards is sustained.
The objections to interrogatories relating to things found in the wreckage after the crash are overruled in view of the statement of plaintiffs’ attorney that every such interrogatory shall be considered reframed so as to substitute for the word “found” and phrase “found in the wreckage” the phrase “observed by you.”
All other objections are overruled.
An interrogatory is not objectionable because it calls for an expert opinion, especially where the expert is an engineer in the regular employ of the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Sachs v. Aluminum Co. of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1948
- Moran v. Pittsburgh-Des Moines Steel Co.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1947
- Bergstrom Paper Co. v. Continental Ins. Co. of City of New YorkDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1947
- Schwartz v. Howard Hosiery Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1939
3Cited by10 opinions
- Broadway & Ninety-Sixth Street Realty Co. v. Loew's Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1958
- Roberson v. Great American InsuranceDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 1969
- Breimon v. General Motors Corp.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1973
- Lapenna v. Upjohn Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1986
- Lee v. KnutsonDistrict Court, N.D. Mississippi · 1986
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.