Legal Opinion

Lapenna v. Upjohn Co.

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided January 3, 1986No. Civ. A. No. 82-4050PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

DITTER, District Judge.

Plaintiffs’ complaint, filed September 16, 1982, alleges that plaintiffs’ decedent, Carmen A. Lapenna, died as a result of an intrathecal injection of Depo-Medrol, a product manufactured by the Upjohn Company. During an April 22, 1985, conference call, I stressed that with the exception of limited discovery required by a February 20, 1985, order, counsel should be ready, and proposed listing the case for trial during the summer. For various reasons not pertinent to this discussion, plaintiffs’ counsel requested a delay until late fall.…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. International Paper Co. v. Fibreboard Corp.District Court, D. Delaware · 1974
  2. Ralston Purina Company v. William A. McFarlandCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1977
  3. Shapiro v. FreemanDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1965
  4. Moran v. Pittsburgh-Des Moines Steel Co.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1947
  5. Anderson v. United Air Lines, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1969

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Brazos River Authority v. GE Ionics, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2006
  2. Resolution Trust Corporation v. North Bridge Associates, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1994
  3. United States v. TaylorDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 1996
  4. Estate of Thompson v. Kawasaki Heavy Industries, Ltd.District Court, N.D. Iowa · 2013
  5. In re Air Crash Disaster at Detroit Metropolitan Airport on August 16, 1987District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1989

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API