Legal Opinion
Sachs v. Aluminum Co. of America
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided April 23, 1948No. 10557PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Per curiam
Upon due consideration of the record and the briefs and oral arguments of the attorneys in this cause, we are of opinion that the district judge properly adjudged Dr. George Sachs in contempt for his neglect and refusal to obey the court’s directions that he answer certain questions propounded to him by counsel for the Aluminum Company of America in the taking of his deposition.
Dr. Sachs is not an attorney but is an expert in X-ray metallography, who was engaged by counsel for the Cold Metal Process Company to make certain tests and X-ray photographs of samples of metal furnished him. His…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
3Cited by27 opinions
- United States v. Horace MeyerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1968
- Crist v. Iowa State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of Iowa · 1963
- Broadway & Ninety-Sixth Street Realty Co. v. Loew's Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1958
- United States v. NYSCO Laboratories, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 1960
- State Ex Rel. State Highway Commission v. SteinkrausNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1966
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.