Legal Opinion

State v. Reinke

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided August 23, 2005No. A04-2219Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

DIETZEN, Judge.

Appellant received a citation for violating a township ordinance prohibiting three or more dogs on the premises owned by any individual residing in the township’s high density population area. Appellant challenged both the constitutionality of the ordinance and her misdemeanor conviction under it, arguing that the ordinance was unenforceable as applied to her because her dog-breeding business was exempted under the preexisting nonconforming use exception. Because appellant was not lawfully operating her dog-breeding business before the ordinance was enacted, we affirm.

FAC…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Fletcher v. St. Paul Pioneer PressSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1999
  2. Frank's Nursery Sales, Inc. v. City of RosevilleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
  3. Samuels v. McCurdySupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  4. In Re TvetenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1987
  5. Connor v. Township of ChanhassenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1957

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API