Legal Opinion

APPROXIMATELY $14,980.00 v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)

Decided June 12, 2008No. 14-07-00164-CVPublishedCited by 44 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MAJORITY OPINION

LESLIE B. YATES, Justice.

This is an appeal from a seizure and forfeiture proceeding under Chapter 59 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure.1 Following a bench trial, the trial court entered a default judgment against appellant Hermes Antonio Rodriguez,2 and based on deemed admissions ordered that $14,980.00 be forfeited to the State. In six issues, appellant contends the trial court *185erred in not permitting him to demonstrate non-receipt of the discovery requests and in admitting the deemed admissions into evidence. We conclude the trial court erred in deciding, pursuant to a…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Cliff v. HugginsTexas Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Mathis v. LockwoodTexas Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Anderson Producing Inc. v. Koch Oil Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Etheredge v. Hidden Valley Airpark Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2005
  5. Payton v. Ashton, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2000

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by44 opinions

  1. Strobel v. Marlow, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2011
  2. Valls v. Johanson & Fairless, L.L.P., Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2010
  3. Brown v. Ogbolu, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2011
  4. Helen Mayfield v. Steve Fullhart and Gray Television Group, Inc. D/B/A KBTX-TV, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2014
  5. Adib C. Rouhana v. Alberto Ramirez, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)2018

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API