Legal Opinion

Mathis v. Lockwood

Texas Supreme Court

Decided June 17, 2005No. 04-0516PublishedCited by 177 opinions

1Per curiam

Mary Mathis, appearing pro se, appeals the trial court’s refusal to set aside a post-answer default judgment against her. The court of appeals affirmed, holding Mathis failed to overcome a presumption that she received notice of the trial setting. 132 S.W.3d 629, 632. Finding neither presumption nor evidence to support this con- elusion, we reverse and remand to the trial court for a new trial.

Mathis and her two children lived with respondent Joseph Lockwood for some period of time before suit. When the relationship soured, Lockwood filed suit seeking a declaration that he and Mathis were not…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Bose Corp. v. Consumers Union of United States, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Craddock v. Sunshine Bus Lines, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1939
  3. Peralta v. Heights Medical Center, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
  4. Stoner v. ThompsonTexas Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Wheeler v. GreenTexas Supreme Court · 2005

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by177 opinions

  1. Dolgencorp of Texas, Inc. v. LermaTexas Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Fidelity & Guaranty Insurance Co. v. Drewery Construction Co.Texas Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Kendrick v. Garcia, Texas Court of Appeals, 11th District (Eastland)2005
  4. Unifund CCR Partners v. WeaverTexas Supreme Court · 2008
  5. APPROXIMATELY $14,980.00 v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2008

172 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API