Mathis v. Lockwood
Texas Supreme Court
1Per curiam
Mary Mathis, appearing pro se, appeals the trial court’s refusal to set aside a post-answer default judgment against her. The court of appeals affirmed, holding Mathis failed to overcome a presumption that she received notice of the trial setting. 132 S.W.3d 629, 632. Finding neither presumption nor evidence to support this con- elusion, we reverse and remand to the trial court for a new trial.
Mathis and her two children lived with respondent Joseph Lockwood for some period of time before suit. When the relationship soured, Lockwood filed suit seeking a declaration that he and Mathis were not…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Bose Corp. v. Consumers Union of United States, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Craddock v. Sunshine Bus Lines, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1939
- Peralta v. Heights Medical Center, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Stoner v. ThompsonTexas Supreme Court · 1979
- Wheeler v. GreenTexas Supreme Court · 2005
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by177 opinions
- Dolgencorp of Texas, Inc. v. LermaTexas Supreme Court · 2009
- Fidelity & Guaranty Insurance Co. v. Drewery Construction Co.Texas Supreme Court · 2006
- Kendrick v. Garcia, Texas Court of Appeals, 11th District (Eastland)2005
- Unifund CCR Partners v. WeaverTexas Supreme Court · 2008
- APPROXIMATELY $14,980.00 v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2008
172 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.