Strobel v. Marlow
Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Opinion By
Justice MOSELEY.
In this accelerated interlocutory appeal, we must first decide if appellant Gary D. Strobel, a prosthetist, is a “health care provider” as that term is defined in chapter 74 of the civil practice and remedies code. See Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem.Code Ann. § 74.001(a)(12)(A) (West 2005). If he is, then we must decide whether appellees Larry and Patricia Marlow complied with the expert report requirements of that chapter. See id. § 74.351(a) (West 2011). As discussed herein, we conclude Strobel is a health care provider under the statute, and that the Marlows failed…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- American Transitional Care Centers of Texas, Inc. v. PalaciosTexas Supreme Court · 2001
- Cliff v. HugginsTexas Supreme Court · 1987
- Ogletree v. MatthewsTexas Supreme Court · 2007
- Leland v. BrandalTexas Supreme Court · 2008
- Marks v. St. Luke's Episcopal HospitalTexas Supreme Court · 2010
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Owens v. HandysideCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2015
- Eleftherios Kaldis AKA Ted Kaldis and Monica Kaldis v. Aurora Loan Services, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2014
- Tactical Air Defense Services, Inc., Gary Fears v. Searock, Jr., Charles, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2013
- Cruz v. SanchezCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2017
- Hendrick Medical Center v. Texas Podiatric Medical Association Cory Brown, DPM And Martin v. Sloan, DPM, Texas Court of Appeals, 11th District (Eastland)2012
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.