Legal Opinion

Leoke v. County of San Bernardino

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 29, 1967No. Civ. 8226PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTamura, J.

Plaintiff, claiming title under a tax deed, sued to quiet title to three adjacent mining claims known as Toltee, Aztie, and Montezuma. Named as defendants were J. B. Wood (the original patentee), the State of California, the County of San Bernardino, and others. The county was the only party to appear and answer; the State merely filed a disclaimer as to the Toltee and Aztie mines and the remaining defendants defaulted. Following a trial by the court, judgment was entered decreeing plaintiff to be the owner of the three claims. The county appeals from the judgment only as it relates to the…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Parsons v. Bristol Development Co.California Supreme Court · 1965
  2. De Luz Homes, Inc. v. County of San DiegoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  3. Estate of RuleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  4. Meyer v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
  5. In Re Estate of ColtonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. County of Alameda v. CarlesonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Marsh v. Mountain Zephyr, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1996
  3. Rabinowitch v. Cal. Western Gas Co.California Court of Appeal · 1967
  4. Life v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990
  5. Winter v. GnaizdaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API