Legal Opinion

Richard L. Bowen & Associates, Inc. v. 1200 West Ninth Street Ltd. Partnership

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided December 13, 1995No. 68455PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Kakpinski, Judge.

This case presents an issue of first impression to this court. We are asked to answer the question of whether a $100,000 supersedeas bond which is executed by the surety company but not signed by the principal or filed with the court is still enforceable by the obligee. We answer this $100,000 question in the affirmative and thus reverse the judgment of the lower court. The relevant facts follow.

Plaintiff-appellant, Richard L. Bowen & Associates, Inc. (“Bowen”), filed an action against defendant-appellee Kassouf for payment for architectural services. After a jury trial,…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Shaw v. J. Pollock & Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1992
  2. Merritt v. J. A. Stafford Co.California Supreme Court · 1968
  3. Haffner v. Commerce Trust Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
  4. State Ex Rel. Fisher v. McNuttOhio Court of Appeals · 1992
  5. Hanover Insurance v. SmithIllinois Supreme Court · 1990

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. People v. Am. Sur. Co., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
  2. Gold Key Realty v. CollinsOhio Court of Appeals · 2013
  3. Neal v. GerstenOhio Court of Appeals · 2024
  4. Helfrich v. MadisonOhio Court of Appeals · 2015
  5. People v. American Surety Co.California Court of Appeal · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API