Richard L. Bowen & Associates, Inc. v. 1200 West Ninth Street Ltd. Partnership
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Kakpinski, Judge.
This case presents an issue of first impression to this court. We are asked to answer the question of whether a $100,000 supersedeas bond which is executed by the surety company but not signed by the principal or filed with the court is still enforceable by the obligee. We answer this $100,000 question in the affirmative and thus reverse the judgment of the lower court. The relevant facts follow.
Plaintiff-appellant, Richard L. Bowen & Associates, Inc. (“Bowen”), filed an action against defendant-appellee Kassouf for payment for architectural services. After a jury trial,…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Shaw v. J. Pollock & Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1992
- Merritt v. J. A. Stafford Co.California Supreme Court · 1968
- Haffner v. Commerce Trust Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
- State Ex Rel. Fisher v. McNuttOhio Court of Appeals · 1992
- Hanover Insurance v. SmithIllinois Supreme Court · 1990
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- People v. Am. Sur. Co., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
- Gold Key Realty v. CollinsOhio Court of Appeals · 2013
- Neal v. GerstenOhio Court of Appeals · 2024
- Helfrich v. MadisonOhio Court of Appeals · 2015
- People v. American Surety Co.California Court of Appeal · 2019