Legal Opinion

People v. Linares

New York Court of Appeals

Decided June 3, 2004PublishedCited by 236 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Rosenblatt, J.

This appeal calls upon us to consider when a defendant is entitled to the substitution of assigned counsel.

I

Following an undercover police investigation, defendant was charged with two counts of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the second degree. As trial approached, defendant wrote to Supreme Court (Snyder, J.), expressing his dissatisfaction with assigned counsel. He claimed that his attorney was not providing him with documents and not acting in his best interests. Defendant added that he planned to retain new counsel.

A month later, still with…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. People v. BaldiNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
  2. People v. StultzNew York Court of Appeals · 2004
  3. Morris v. SlappySupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. People v. SidesNew York Court of Appeals · 1990
  5. People v. BrabsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1961

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by236 opinions

  1. People v. PortoNew York Court of Appeals · 2010
  2. People v. RoldanCalifornia Supreme Court · 2005
  3. People v. SmithNew York Court of Appeals · 2012
  4. People v. NelsonNew York Court of Appeals · 2006
  5. People v. WatkinsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010

231 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API