Legal Opinion

People v. Smith

New York Court of Appeals

Decided February 14, 2012PublishedCited by 95 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Jones, J.

The issues before this Court are whether Supreme Court abused its discretion by denying defendant’s request for the substitution of assigned counsel and by issuing a Sandoval ruling which permitted the prosecutor to refer to defendant’s prior drug-related felony convictions by naming the specific crimes, should he choose to testify. We hold that it did not.

On April 25, 2007, defendant was arrested for the sale of cocaine after detectives, assigned to the surveillance of drug *591activity in a particular area, observed defendant conduct two apparent drug transactions…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. People v. BaldiNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
  2. People v. SandovalNew York Court of Appeals · 1974
  3. People v. SidesNew York Court of Appeals · 1990
  4. People v. HayesNew York Court of Appeals · 2002
  5. People v. LinaresNew York Court of Appeals · 2004

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by95 opinions

  1. The People v. Anthony JonesNew York Court of Appeals · 2016
  2. People v. MattisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
  3. The People v. Thomas JacksonNew York Court of Appeals · 2017
  4. People v. LeeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
  5. People v. BradfordAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014

90 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API