Cortinas v. Wilson
Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
LAGARDE, Justice.
Bertha Cortinas sued Carrie Anita Wilson for damages arising from an automobile accident. On appeal, Cortinas contends that the trial court erred in granting Wilson's motion for summary judgment based on the statute of limitations. For the reasons that follow, we affirm the trial court’s judgment.
PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
On June 17, 1989, an automobile driven by Carrie Wilson collided with an automobile driven by Bertha Cortinas. The parties exchanged driver’s licenses and insurance information at the accident scene. When Cortinas contacted an attorney, however, she told…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Nixon v. Mr. Property Management Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1985
- Gulbenkian v. PennTexas Supreme Court · 1952
- Roark v. STALLWORTH OIL AND GAS, INCTexas Supreme Court · 1991
- Enserch Corp. v. ParkerTexas Supreme Court · 1990
- Continental Southern Lines, Inc. v. HillandTexas Supreme Court · 1975
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Hennessey v. Vanguard Insurance Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)1995
- McCord v. Dodds, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2001
- Fisher v. Westmont Hospitality, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)1996
- Riston v. Doe, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2004
- Salahat v. KincaidCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2006
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.