Salahat v. Kincaid
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
TERRIE LIVINGSTON, Justice.
I. Introduction
This is an appeal from a take-nothing summary judgment rendered against appellants Esmat and May Lynn Salahat in their personal injury suit against appellee Michael Lynn Kincaid. In their sole issue, appellants contend that the trial court erred by granting appellee’s summary judgment motion because a genuine issue of material fact exists concerning whether *343appellants’ claim was time barred by the applicable statute of limitations. We affirm.
II.Background Facts
On February 25, 2002, appellants and appellee were involved in an automobile…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- City of Houston v. Clear Creek Basin AuthorityTexas Supreme Court · 1979
- Valence Operating Co. v. DorsettTexas Supreme Court · 2005
- Southwestern Electric Power Co. v. GrantTexas Supreme Court · 2002
- Rhone-Poulenc, Inc. v. SteelTexas Supreme Court · 1999
- Great American Reserve Insurance Co. v. San Antonio Plumbing Supply Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1965
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Nesbit v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2007
- Equitable Recovery, L.P. v. Heath Insurance Brokers of Texas, L.P., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2007
- Keith D. Johnson v. CIty of Fort Worth D/B/A Fort Worth City Police Department, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2009
- Keith D. Johnson v. CIty of Fort Worth D/B/A Fort Worth City Police Department, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2009
- Keith D. Johnson v. CIty of Fort Worth D/B/A Fort Worth City Police Department, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2009
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.