Legal Opinion
Hennessey v. Vanguard Insurance Co.
Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)
Decided March 31, 1995No. 07-94-0058-CVPublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BOYD, Justice.
Gerard and Kathleen Hennessey (Hennes-seys) bring three points of error challenging a take-nothing summary judgment rendered in favor of appellees Vanguard Insurance Company (Vanguard), Republic Insurance Company (Republic), and Winterthur Reinsurance Corporation of America (Wintert-hur). For the reasons expressed herein, we affirm the judgment insofar as it renders a take-nothing judgment against Winterthur. However, we sever that portion concerning Vanguard and Republic and remand that portion to the trial court.
The Hennesseys were the insureds under a homeowners insurance…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Nixon v. Mr. Property Management Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1985
- City of Houston v. Clear Creek Basin AuthorityTexas Supreme Court · 1979
- Lear Siegler, Inc. v. PerezTexas Supreme Court · 1991
- Arnold v. National County Mutual Fire Insurance Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1987
- Viles v. Security National Insurance Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1990
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- State Farm Lloyds v. JohnsonTexas Supreme Court · 2009
- Allison v. Fire Insurance Exchange, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2002
- Abraham Investment Co. v. Payne Ranch, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)1998
- Wells v. American States Preferred Insurance Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1996
- Breshears v. State Farm Lloyds, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2004
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.