Legal Opinion
United States v. Karl Keller
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided May 2, 1990No. 88-4267PublishedCited by 130 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BEEZER, Circuit Judge:
Karl Keller, a federal prisoner, appeals pro se the district court’s denial of his motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 challenging his sentence and his plea. Keller contends that in setting his parole date, the government breached the plea agreement; that the presentence report contained erroneous information; and that his plea is invalid because he received ineffective assistance of counsel. We affirm.
I
Keller confessed to participation in seven armed bank robberies and one attempted robbery. Keller’s attorney, Foster, negotiated an agreement whereby Keller would plea guilty…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Hill v. LockhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Santobello v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Marcus T. Baumann v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
- Jonah Iaea v. Franklin Sunn, Director of the Department of Social Services, State of HawaiiCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- Joseph Torrey v. Wayne EstelleCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by130 opinions
- Javier Hincapie Sanchez v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- United States v. Alberto De La FuenteCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
- United States v. Jose Becerra Salvatore Larizza Gabriel BecerraCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
- Beavers v. SaffleCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2000
- UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Frank Charles McMULLEN, Jr., Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
125 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.