Legal Opinion
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Francisco AGUILAR-MUNIZ, Defendant-Appellant
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided September 17, 1998No. 96-10501PublishedCited by 130 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PREGERSON, District Judge:
Appointed counsel for Francisco Aguilar-Muniz has filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), stating that there are no meritorious issues for appeal and requesting leave to withdraw as counsel. Although notified of his right to respond to counsel’s motion to withdraw, appellant has failed to respond. After consideration of the issues identified by counsel, and after an independent review of the record, we grant the motion to withdraw and affirm the decision below.
On November 9, 1995, Francisco Aguilar-Muniz…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Penson v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Harmelin v. MichiganSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- United States v. Lawrence BuchananCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- United States v. Kenneth R. BruceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by130 opinions
- United States v. WatsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- United States v. Angel TangCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000
- United States v. Jeffrey LittlejohnCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- United States v. Ronald FisherCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000
- United States v. John TimbanaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
125 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.