Legal Opinion

State v. Adcox

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided June 21, 1926PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Hart, J.,

(after stating the facts). The Attorney General says that the indictment is based on § 2462 of Crawford & Moses’ Digest, which reads as follows: “If any person shall forge or counterfeit any writing whatever, whereby fraudulently to obtain the possession or to deprive another of any money or property, or cause him to be injured in his estate or lawful rights, or if he shall utter -and publish such instrument, knowing it to be forged and counterfeited, be shall, on cónviction, be confined in the penitentiary not less than two nor more than ten years.”

In Goucher v. State, 204 N. W.…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. People v. BenditCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Goucher v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1925
  3. Maloney v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1909
  4. State v. FordOregon Supreme Court · 1918
  5. People v. PfeifferIllinois Supreme Court · 1909

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. LutesWashington Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Wright v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1949
  3. United States F. & G. Co. v. First Nat. Bank of Ft. MorganSupreme Court of Colorado · 1961
  4. State v. ReeseCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1978
  5. Binganan v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API