Legal Opinion
Wright v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided January 19, 1949No. 11824PublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DRIVER, District Judge.
The appellant was convicted of transporting forged -securities in interstate commerce -in violation of the National Stolen Property Act, as amended, 18 U.S.C.A. §- 415. Each of the four counts of the indictment recites that the -security transported was a certain hank check, drawn by the appellant on a hank in which he did-not have -funds or credit. The counts differ from each other only as to the dates, and amounts of the checks and the names of the payees. Appellant -waived trial byju-ry and the case was submitted to the Court on -an agreed statement of fa-c-ts.. From…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- United States v. SheridanSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Milton v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1940
- United States v. StaatsSupreme Court of the United States · 1849
- Goucher v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1925
- Williams v. Territory of ArizonaArizona Supreme Court · 1910
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Gilbert v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Wayne S. Marteney v. United States of America, C. M. Henderson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1954
- State v. SchoelermanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1982
- United States v. Daniel Michael Daly, Harold Dean Klemp, Joseph Diaz, Gene Floyd Criswell, and Michael Richard RyanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
- Vizcarra-Ayala v. MukaseyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.