Legal Opinion

Fortin v. Hartford Underwriters Insurance

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided January 1, 2013No. AC 31111PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

ESPINOSA, J.

The plaintiffs, Joseph Fortin, Samuel Kofkoff, Robert Kofkoff and Kofkoff Egg Farm, LLC, in this civil action concerning insurance benefits appeal from the summary judgment rendered in favor of the defendant North River Insurance Company.1 The plaintiffs claim that the court improperly (1) granted the defendant’s motion to preclude testimony from one of the plaintiffs’ witnesses, (2) granted summary judgment in the defendant’s favor after granting its motion to preclude and (3) denied five postjudgment motions. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.

The record discloses…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Walton v. Town of New HartfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
  2. State v. FabricatoreSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
  3. Metropolitan Life Insurance v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
  4. Sullivan v. Metro-North Commuter RailroadSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
  5. Simms v. ChaissonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. v. EldonConnecticut Appellate Court · 2013
  2. Hornung v. HornungSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2016
  3. Hartford Roman Catholic Diocesan, Corp. v. Interstate Fire & Casualty Co.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2016
  4. U.S. Bank, N.A., Trustee v. MorawskaConnecticut Appellate Court · 2016
  5. Meridian Partners, LLC v. Dragone Classic Motorcars, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2017

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API