Maryland Casualty Co. v. Jones
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
RUDKIN, Circuit Judge.
This was an action at law against a surety company on a bond of indemnity. The action was tried by the court without the intervention of a jury, by written stipulation of the parties. As is usually the ease, the action presented or involved two questions: First, the question of liability; and, second, the extent or amount of that liability. At the close of the testimony offered by both parties, the surety company interposed a so-called motion for non-suit on five different grounds. The third ground of the motion was that there was no evidence of any wrongful abstraction,…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Fleischmann Construction Co. v. United States Ex Rel. ForsbergSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Maryland Casualty Co. v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
- American State Bank of Omaha v. Mueller Grain Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1926
- Mueller Grain Co. v. American State BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
3Cited by4 opinions
- Gardner v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1934
- Love v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1935
- Century Indemnity Co. v. NelsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1936
- General Acc. Assur. Co. v. CaldwellCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1932