Legal Opinion

American State Bank of Omaha v. Mueller Grain Co.

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided January 5, 1926No. 3433PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

PAGE, Circuit Judge.

Erom June to August 16, 1917, defendant in error, called plaintiff, at Peoria, sold grain on commission for one Richter, doing business as United States Commission Company, Omaha, Neb. Uniform order bills of lading were attached to drafts, drawn for an arbitrary amount, by Richter on plaintiff, in favor of plaintiff in error, called defendant, an Oma ha bank. Defendant gave credit to Richter for the drafts, and they were sent through the regular course of banking for collection and were paid by plaintiff at Peoria. Two such drafts were accompanied by bills of lading…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Grand Trunk Railway Co. v. CummingsSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
  2. Liberty Oil Co. v. Condon National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
  3. Leather Manufacturers' Bank v. Merchants' BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
  4. Goetz v. Bank of Kansas CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1887
  5. Bartlett v. First National BankIllinois Supreme Court · 1910

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Maryland Casualty Co. v. JonesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API