Legal Opinion
Maryland Casualty Co. v. Jones
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided June 3, 1929No. 524PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Sanford
The respondent brought an action at law against the petitioner in a superior court of California, to recover upon an indemnity bond. The case was removed to the federal District Court; and was there tried by the court, without the intervention of a jury, which was duly waived by a written stipulation of the parties. Rev. Stat. § 649. The. District Court made special findings of fact on which it gave judgment against the defendant. . Upon a writ of error this judgment was affirmed by the Circuit Court of Appeals. 27 F. (2d) 521. The case is here for limited review, on the question whether that…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Central Transportation Co. v. Pullman's Palace Car Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Fleischmann Construction Co. v. United States Ex Rel. ForsbergSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
- St. Louis v. Western Union Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Lewellyn v. Electric Reduction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Humphreys v. Third Nat. Bank of CincinnatiCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1896
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- McGill Incorporated v. John Zink Company, McGill Incorporated, Cross-Appellant v. John Zink Company, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
- White v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1931
- Massachusetts Protective Ass'n v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1940
- Baldwin Rubber Co. v. Paine & Williams Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1938
- Perry v. WigginsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1931
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.