Legal Opinion
Loral Fairchild Corp. v. Victor Co. of Japan, Ltd.
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided November 7, 1995No. Civ. A. 92-0128-ARR, 91-5056-ARRPublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
RADER, Circuit Judge (sitting by designation).
In this patent case, Loral Fairchild Corporation (“Loral”) alleges infringement by defendants of certain claims of U.S. Patent 3,896,485. The ’485 patent discloses structural features of and various uses of charge coupled devices (“CCDs”). Defendants deny liability and assert numerous defenses including invalidity, non-infringement, and lack of ownership. Defendants also assert that Loral did not comply with the marking requirements of the Patent Act. This court has scheduled this case for trial before a jury beginning on January…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- P.M. Palumbo v. Don-Joy Co.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1985
- Amsted Industries Incorporated, Plaintiff/cross-Appellant v. Buckeye Steel Castings CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1994
- Alden W. Hanson v. Alpine Valley Ski Area, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Loral Fairchild Corp. v. Sony Corp.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1999
- Loral Fairchild Corp. v. Victor Co. of Japan, Ltd.District Court, E.D. New York · 1996
- ADC Telecommunications, Inc. v. Siecor Corp.District Court, D. Delaware · 1997
- Loral Fairchild Corporation v. Sony Corporation And Sony Electronics Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1999
- Merck & Co. v. Mediplan Health Consulting, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2006
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.