Legal Opinion

P.M. Palumbo v. Don-Joy Co.

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Decided May 20, 1985No. Appeal 84-1691PublishedCited by 148 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DAVIS, Circuit Judge.

P.M. Palumbo, et al. (Palumbo), the patentee and his company, seek review of a grant of summary judgment of non-infringement by the United States District Court for the Southern District of California. We reverse and remand.

I

BACKGROUND

A. Palumbo’s’744 patent

Palumbo sued Don-Joy, et al. (Don-Joy) for infringement of U.S. Patent No. 4,296,-744 (’744 patent). That patent discloses a patellar brace useful for the diagnosis and treatment of patellar subluxation. Patellar subluxation is the undesirable movement or dislocation of the patella (kneecap). The invention purports to…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. Graver Tank & Mfg. Co. v. Linde Air Products Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  3. Gillespie v. United States Steel Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1964
  4. Barmag Barmer Maschinenfabrik Ag v. Murata MacHinery Ltd., and Murata of America, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
  5. Litton Industrial Products, Inc., Appellant/cross-Appellee v. Solid State Systems Corp., Appellee/cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1985

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by148 opinions

  1. Herbert Markman and Positek, Inc. v. Westview Instruments, Inc. And Althon Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
  2. Sri International v. Matsushita Electric Corporation of America and Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1985
  3. Pennwalt Corporation, Appellant/cross-Appellee v. Durand-Wayland, Inc., Appellee/cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
  4. Charles C. Johnston and Gordon P. Ramsey, as Trustees of the Amec Liquidating Trust v. Ivac CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1989
  5. Hoechst Celanese Corporation v. Bp Chemicals Limited and Sterling Chemicals, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996

143 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API