Legal Opinion
Bath Junkie Franchise, Inc. v. Hygiene, L.L.C.
Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)
Decided February 7, 2008No. 09-07-395 CV, 09-07-437 CVPublishedCited by 36 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
2Per curiam
By way of petition for writ of mandamus and interlocutory appeal, Bath Junkie Franchise, Inc. (“Bath Junkie”) seeks relief from the trial court’s denial of its motion to compel arbitration. In a single issue, Bath Junkie contends that the trial court abused its discretion in denying the motion. We have consolidated the two proceedings and dispose of them simultaneously. We agree that the trial court erred when it denied Bath Junkie’s request for arbitration and conditionally grant the petition for mandamus in Cause No. 09-07-487 CV. Having granted full relief under our mandamus…
3Cases cited52 opinions
- Walker v. PackerTexas Supreme Court · 1992
- First Options of Chicago, Inc. v. KaplanSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- In Re Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaTexas Supreme Court · 2004
- J.M. Davidson, Inc. v. WebsterTexas Supreme Court · 2003
- Jack B. Anglin Co., Inc. v. TippsTexas Supreme Court · 1992
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by36 opinions
- Addicks Services, Inc. v. GGP-BRIDGELAND, LPCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2010
- Texas La Fiesta Auto Sales, LLC v. Belk, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2011
- Glassell Producing Company, Inc. v. Jared Resources, Ltd., Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2014
- Ascendant Anesthesia Pllc v. Abazi, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2011
- In Re Green Tree Servicing LLC, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2008
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.