Legal Opinion
United States v. Richardson
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided June 19, 2014No. 11-10346PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
2Per curiam
Justin Allan Richardson appeals his conviction and sentence for violating the registration requirements of the Sex Offender Registration and Notification Act (“SOR-NA”). He raises several constitutional challenges to SORNA and argues that the district court erred in calculating his criminal history. We affirm.1
BACKGROUND
In 1994, Richardson was convicted of lewd and lascivious acts with a child in a California state court and ordered to register as a sex offender. On July 21, 2010, a federal grand jury indicted Richardson for failing to register as a sex offender as required by SORNA.…
3Cases cited19 opinions
- Mistretta v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Yakus v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Whitman v. American Trucking Assns., Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Printz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Touby v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by13 opinions
- United States v. WhiteCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2015
- United States v. NicholsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2014
- United States v. Anthony RossCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2017
- United States v. CotonutsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2016
- United States v. MorganDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.