Legal Opinion

United States v. Nichols

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided December 30, 2014No. 14-3041PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McHUGH, Circuit Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

Lester Nichols is a convicted sex offender who left the United States without updating his status on the federal sex offender registry. He was brought back to the United States and charged with failing to register, in violation of the Sex Offender Registration and Notification Act (SOR-NA), 18 U.S.C. § 2250(a). On appeal, he challenges his conviction based on two theories: (1) SORNA’s updating requirement does not apply in situations like his where the sex offender moves from a SORNA jurisdiction to a non-SORNA jurisdiction, and (2) SORNA’s delegation of…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Mistretta v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Whitman v. American Trucking Assns., Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2001
  3. A. L. A. Schechter Poultry Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  4. Panama Refining Co. v. RyanSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  5. Carr v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2010

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. United States v. WhiteCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2015
  2. Nichols v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
  3. BancInsure, Inc. v. Federal Deposit InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2015
  4. United States v. Anthony RossCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2017
  5. United States v. CraigCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2015

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API