Legal Opinion

Touby v. United States

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided May 20, 1991No. 90-6282PublishedCited by 188 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice O’Connor

Petitioners were convicted of manufacturing and conspiring to manufacture “Euphoria,” a drug temporarily designated as a schedule I controlled substance pursuant to § 201(h) of the Controlled Substances Act, 98 Stat. 2071, 21 U. S. C. § 811(h). We consider whether § 201(h) unconstitutionally delegates legislative power to the Attorney General and whether the Attorney General’s subdelegation to the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) was authorized by statute.

I

In 1970, Congress enacted the Controlled Substances Act (Act), 84 Stat. 1242, as amended, 21 U. S. C. §801 et seq. The Act…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Mistretta v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Yakus v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  3. United States v. GiordanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. J. W. Hampton, Jr., & Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
  5. National Broadcasting Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by188 opinions

  1. Whitman v. American Trucking Assns., Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2001
  2. Gonzales v. O Centro Espírita Beneficente União Do VegetalSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
  3. Loving v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  4. Texas Boll Weevil Eradication Foundation, Inc. v. LewellenTexas Supreme Court · 1997
  5. United States v. HammoudCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2004

183 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API