Legal Opinion
United States v. Cotonuts
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided January 26, 2016No. 13-1539UnpublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER AND JUDGMENT*
JEROME A. HOLMES, Circuit Judge.
Defendant-Appellant Glen Earl Coto-nuts was convicted for failing to register as a sex offender under the Sex Offender Registration and Notification Act (“SOR-NA”). 18 U.S.C. § 2250. Among other things, he was sentenced to a term of supervised release. As a condition of his supervised-release term, Mr. Cotonuts was required to submit to a penile-plethysmo-graph test. Mr. Cotonuts challenges his conviction, claiming that the Attorney General’s authority to apply SORNA retroactively violates the nondelegation doctrine. Mr. Cotonuts also argues…
2Cases cited55 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Sibron v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Spencer v. KemnaSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Mistretta v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Bradford v. U.S. Department of LaborDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2022
- Raleigh v. PolisDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2020