Legal Opinion

Mooney v. Shelfer

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided September 15, 1949No. 16744, 16756PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Duckworth, Chief Justice.

1. “Where, in a suit .against two codefendants, the verdict and judgment are adverse to the defendants, and one of them makes a motion for a new trial, which is overruled, the movant can except to the judgment overruling his motion, and bring the case to the Supreme Court without making the other defendant a parly to the bill of exceptions; and a failure to do so will not work a dismissal of the writ of error.” Turner v. Newell, 129 Ga. 89 (1) (58 S. E. 657); Durrence v. Cowart, 160 Ga. 671 (129 S. E. 26); Butler v. Kendrick, 172 Ga. 322, 330 (158 S. E. 13); Ball v.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Turner v. NewellSupreme Court of Georgia · 1907
  2. Durrence v. CowartSupreme Court of Georgia · 1925
  3. Lakes v. LakesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1931
  4. Ball v. MooreSupreme Court of Georgia · 1935
  5. Butler v. KendrickSupreme Court of Georgia · 1931

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Hardeman v. Southern Home Ins. Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1965
  2. Hardeman v. Southern Home InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1965
  3. Blaylock v. WareCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1950

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API