Mooney v. Shelfer
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Duckworth, Chief Justice.
1. “Where, in a suit .against two codefendants, the verdict and judgment are adverse to the defendants, and one of them makes a motion for a new trial, which is overruled, the movant can except to the judgment overruling his motion, and bring the case to the Supreme Court without making the other defendant a parly to the bill of exceptions; and a failure to do so will not work a dismissal of the writ of error.” Turner v. Newell, 129 Ga. 89 (1) (58 S. E. 657); Durrence v. Cowart, 160 Ga. 671 (129 S. E. 26); Butler v. Kendrick, 172 Ga. 322, 330 (158 S. E. 13); Ball v.…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Turner v. NewellSupreme Court of Georgia · 1907
- Durrence v. CowartSupreme Court of Georgia · 1925
- Lakes v. LakesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1931
- Ball v. MooreSupreme Court of Georgia · 1935
- Butler v. KendrickSupreme Court of Georgia · 1931
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Hardeman v. Southern Home Ins. Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1965
- Hardeman v. Southern Home InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1965
- Blaylock v. WareCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1950