Legal Opinion

Blaylock v. Ware

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided May 2, 1950No. 32972, 32973, 32998, 32999Published

1Opinion of the CourtTownsend, J.

(After stating the foregoing facts.) All persons who are interested in sustaining or reversing the judgment of the trial court are necessary parties on appeal, and must be made parties to the bill of exceptions. Greeson v. Taylor, 160 Ga. 392 (128 S. E. 177). However, where in a suit against two codefendants, verdict and judgment have been entered against them jointly, and one of such codefendants makes a motion for a new trial which is overruled, the movant may except to the judgment overruling his motion and bring the case to this court without making the other defendant a party to the bill…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Cone v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1941
  2. Morrow v. Southeastern Stages Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1942
  3. Georgia Railway & Power Co. v. RyanCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1919
  4. Jordan v. LeeCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1935
  5. Durrence v. CowartSupreme Court of Georgia · 1925

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API