Legal Opinion
Hardeman v. Southern Home Insurance
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided May 4, 1965No. 41119PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Felton, Chief Judge.
A motion to dismiss the writ of error was filed on the ground that Clyde E. Lee and Douglas 0. Lee, *640defendants below, were neither named nor served as defendants in error.
Regardless of whether or not Clyde Lee was a necessary party to the bill of exceptions, the writ of error can not be dismissed because of the failure of the bill of exceptions to designate him as such, since service of the bill of exceptions was acknowledged by the firm of Siegel, Lewis & Williams, “Attorneys of record for Clyde E. Lee.” See Code Ann. § 6-1202 (Ga. L. 1880-81, p. 123; 1957, p. 224);…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Saint Paul Fire & Marine Insurance v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1960
- Jones v. Georgia Casualty & Surety Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1953
- Georgia Casualty & Surety Co. v. TurnerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1952
- United States Casualty Co. v. Georgia Southern & Florida Ry. Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1957
- Federal Land Bank v. PaschallSupreme Court of Georgia · 1935
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- James v. Pennsylvania General InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1983
- American Mutual Fire Insurance v. PassmoreSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1981
- Smith v. HardyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1977
- Mims v. ClantonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1996
- Georgia Mutual Insurance v. CookCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1979
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.