Legal Opinion
Redman v. POTOMAC PLACE ASSOCIATES, LLC
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided May 28, 2009No. 07-CV-335, 07-CV-1255PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
STEADMAN, Senior Judge:
The instant appeal arises from the efforts of appellee Potomac Place Associates, LLC (“Potomac”) to convert an apartment building from residential tenant housing to condominiums. Appellant Deborah Red-man (“Ms. Redman”) was a tenant in the building who claimed the right to continue in that capacity after conversion as a “disabled tenant” under an amendment to D.C.Code § 42-3402.08 that became effective only during the course of Potomac’s eviction action against her. We agree with the trial court that the amendment did not operate to benefit Ms. Redman because she was…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Greene v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Mendes v. JohnsonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1978
- Davis v. MooreDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2001
- Drayton v. Poretsky Management, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1983
- Habib v. ThurstonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1986
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Payne v. District of Columbia GovernmentCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2013
- Payne v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010
- Metroil, Inc. v. Exxonmobil Oil Corp.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2012
- Baumann v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
- Metroil, Inc. v. ExxonMobil Oil Corp.District Court, District of Columbia · 2010
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.