Legal Opinion
Gluck v. Gluck
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided June 17, 1980PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Per curiam
The defendant, in her appeal from a dissolution proceeding, has raised several claims of error attacking the judgment dissolving her marriage on the ground that it had broken down irretrievably. Her assignment of errors included a broad attack on the trial court’s finding, but these claims have not been briefed and are therefore considered abandoned. Healy v. White, 173 Conn. 438, 441, 378 A.2d 540 (1977). Those assigned errors which were pursued by the defendant in her brief are discussed below.
The defendant first challenges both the complaint form prescribed by Practice Book, Form 504.1,…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Maynard v. HillSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
- Hardware Dealers Mutual Fire Insurance v. Glidden Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Pasquariello v. PasquarielloSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1975
- Healy v. WhiteSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1977
- Smith v. SmithSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1962
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Gaudio v. GaudioConnecticut Appellate Court · 1990
- Skinner v. AnglikerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
- Franchi v. Farmholme, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
- State v. Hossan-Maxwell, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- Kroop v. KroopSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.