Legal Opinion
Sanchez v. Philip Morris Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided April 20, 1993No. Nos. 91-6354, 91-6371PublishedCited by 75 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SETH, Circuit Judge.
Appellee Raul C. Sanchez filed an action against Appellants Philip Morris, Inc. (“Philip Morris”) and Ralph Rayburn alleging reverse gender and national origin discrimination in violation of Title VII of the federal Civil Rights Act, as well as violations of Oklahoma public policy. After dismissing the state public policy claim, the United States District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma found Appellants liable on both theories and awarded damages. Appellants appeal the imposition of liability, and Appellee cross-appeals the district court’s dismissal of the…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- United States Postal Service Board of Governors v. AikensSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Furnco Construction Corp. v. WatersSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Pullman-Standard v. SwintSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by75 opinions
- Aramburu v. The Boeing CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1997
- Beaird v. Seagate Technology, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998
- Bullington v. United Air Lines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1999
- Adamson v. Multi Community Diversified Services, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2008
- Kendall v. WatkinsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1993
70 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.