Legal Opinion

Iott v. Mosby

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided June 9, 1928No. 28,130PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Burch, J.:

The action was one by Hattie G. Iott, as widow of Walter Iott, deceased, and as guardian of his minor children, to recover compensation for his death. Plaintiff prevailed, and defendants appeal.

The deceased was a mechanic employed to repair cars for defendants. Defendants’ place of business is a room fifty feet wide and sixty-five feet long, situated at 119-121 North Kansas avenue, in the city of Topeka. Automobiles having body rattles are given road tests to locate the offending noises. The deceased was directed by defendants’ shop foreman…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Bevard v. Skidmore-Patterson Coal Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1917
  2. Hicks ex rel. Hicks v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1917
  3. Carter v. UhrichSupreme Court of Kansas · 1927
  4. Wise v. Central Dairy Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1926
  5. Gadberry v. Hutchinson Egg Case Filler Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1919

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Riffe Petroleum Co. v. Great Nat. Corp., Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1980
  2. Liberty Mutual Insurance Company v. AdamsIdaho Supreme Court · 1966
  3. Iott v. Continental Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1930
  4. Wetlaufer v. HowseSupreme Court of Kansas · 1937
  5. Fox v. Victory Ice Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1930

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API