American Mutual Liability Insurance v. Duesenberg
Indiana Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtShake, J.
—This is an appeal from a judgment against the appellant, rendered when it refused to plead further upon the overruling of its demurrer to the appellee’s amended complaint. The demurrer was upon two grounds, namely, that the court had no jurisdiction of the subject matter of the action, and that the amended complaint did not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action. The first assignment has been waived by the appellant’s brief, so that the sufficiency of the amended complaint is the only matter for our consideration.
The essential facts disclosed by the amended complaint are…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Morris v. Central West Casualty Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1932
- Interstate Business Men's Acc. Ass'n of Des Moines v. LesterCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1919
- Robertson v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1927
- Samson v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1930
- Iott v. Continental Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1930
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Gulf Insurance Company v. TilleyDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 1967
- Egbert v. EGBERTIndiana Supreme Court · 1956
- Jernigan v. New Amsterdam Casualty CompanyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1961
- Taylor v. American Underwriters, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1976
- Baylor Heating & Air Conditioning, Inc. v. Federated Mutual Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.