Legal Opinion

Dunn v. Hill

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided March 28, 2007No. 05084588M; A130665PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtRosenblum, J.

Plaintiff appeals the dismissal of the writ of habeas corpus. ORS 34.710. He contends that the trial court erred in granting defendant’s motion to dismiss the writ for failure to state a claim, in denying plaintiffs motion to amend his replication, and in ordering him to pay a $33 filing fee. For the reasons explained below, we agree that the trial court erred in granting defendant’s motion to dismiss the writ; accordingly, we reverse the judgment. We affirm the court’s order imposing a $33 filing fee.

Plaintiff, an inmate of the Snake River Correctional Institution, petitioned the trial court…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Lewis v. CaseySupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  2. Bounds v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. Murray v. GiarratanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. Penrod v. CuppOregon Supreme Court · 1978
  5. Bedell v. SchiedlerOregon Supreme Court · 1989

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Barrett v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API