Legal Opinion
Charles M. KEENAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Frank HALL, Director Oregon Department of Corrections, Et Al., Defendants-Appellees
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided May 8, 1996No. 94-35726PublishedCited by 910 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by Judge FLETCHER; dissent by Judge RYMER.
FLETCHER, Circuit Judge:
Charles M. Keenan appeals the grant of summary judgment dismissing his prisoner’s § 1983 action. Keenan alleged that the defendants transferred him without due process, confined him under cruel and unusual conditions, denied him his First Amendment rights, denied him access to the courts, wrongfully opened his mail from the courts outside his presence, and imposed an illegal fine. He seeks both damages and injunctive relief. We have jurisdiction, 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm in part and reverse in part.
I. BACKGROUND
Ke…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Wolff v. McDonnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Bell v. WolfishSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Sandin v. ConnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Rhodes v. ChapmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by910 opinions
- Wilkinson v. AustinSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Lonnie Williams, Jr. v. Daniel ParamoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
- Ramirez v. GalazaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Johnson v. LewisCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Onofre T. Serrano v. S.W. FrancisCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
905 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.