Legal Opinion

Cermak v. Hertz Corp.

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided July 8, 1958PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

53 N.J. Super. 455 (1958)

147 A.2d 800

PAUL CERMAK, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,

v.

THE HERTZ CORPORATION, ETC., DEFENDANT AND AETNA METALCRAFT, INC., ETC., AND OLINTO J. DIGEORGE, JOINTLY, ETC., DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Argued June 2, 1958.

Reargued June 16, 1958.

Decided July 8, 1958.

Before Judges PRICE, HANEMAN and SCHETTINO.

Mr. Sylvester S. Garfield and Mr. Philip L. Nadler argued the cause for plaintiff-respondent (Mr. Victor P. Mullica, on the brief; Mr. Pasquale Pipi and Messrs. Gross & Garfield, attorneys).

Mr. Roger F. Lancaster argued the cause for…

2Cases cited42 opinions

  1. Ferdinand v. Agricultural Ins. Co. of Watertown, NYSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1956
  2. Shammas v. ShammasSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1952
  3. Doran v. ThomsenSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1908
  4. Hartpence v. GrouleffSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1954
  5. In Re the Estate of Santa PerroneSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1950

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Caldwell v. HaynesSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1994
  2. Barry v. THE COCA COLA CO.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1967
  3. Pellicer v. St. Barnabas HospitalSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2009
  4. McKinley v. Slenderella Systems of Camden, NJ, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1960
  5. Ming Yu He v. MillerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2011

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API