Ming Yu He v. Miller
Supreme Court of New Jersey
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Hoens
This appeal, and its complex procedural path, starkly illustrates the profound difficulties that our trial courts and appellate tribunals continue to encounter as they seek to understand and apply the concepts surrounding remittitur. As such, it challenges this Court to create a workable template to guide both the trial and appellate courts when they are called upon to apply the remittitur device. In addressing the issues on appeal, however, we endeavor to make plain the circumstances in which remittitur can and must operate, for only through that effort can we ensure that remittitur is…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Dolson v. AnastasiaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1969
- Baxter v. Fairmont Food Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1977
- Carey v. LovettSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1993
- Caldwell v. HaynesSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1994
- Carrino v. NovotnySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1979
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Battaglia v. United Parcel Service, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2013
- Ramon Cuevas v. Wentworth Group(075077)Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2016
- Henebema v. South Jersey Transportation AuthorityNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2013
- Danny Caicedo v. Fabian CaicedoNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2015
- Lucia Serico v. Robert M. Rothberg, M.D.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2017
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.