Legal Opinion

Fleming v. Mason & Dixon Lines, Inc.

District Court, E.D. Tennessee

Decided November 25, 1941No. 115PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TAYLOR, Judge.

The questions presented by defendant’s motion and relied upon primarily in argument, the defendant not waiving for the record any question presented by the motion, are (1) that plaintiff is not entitled to injunctive relief because the complaint makes no specific or any allegation as to contemplated or prospective violations, and (2) the right of defendant to more specific or detailed information as to the facts relied upon by plaintiff as basis for its allegations that the defendant has violated the Fair Labor Standards Act, 29 U.S.C.A. § 201 et seq.

As to the first ground of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Southern Pacific Terminal Co. v. Interstate Commerce CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
  2. Federal Trade Commission v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
  3. Fleming v. Cincinnati Union Terminal Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1941

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Walling v. Fairmont Creamery Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1943
  2. United States v. Association of American RailroadsDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 1945
  3. Walling v. Peavy-Wilson Lumber Co.District Court, W.D. Louisiana · 1943
  4. Best Foods, Inc. v. General Mills, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 1943
  5. Walling v. Halliburton Oil Well Cementing Co.District Court, S.D. California · 1944

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API