Legal Opinion
Walling v. Halliburton Oil Well Cementing Co.
District Court, S.D. California
Decided September 29, 1944No. 2912PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
J. F. T. O’CONNOR, District Judge.
On May 10, 1943, plaintiff filed his complaint seeking to enjoin the defendant from violating the provisions of Sections 7(a) and 11(c) of the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938, 29 U.S.C.A. §§ 201-219, hereinafter called the Act.
Section 7(a) of the Act requires that employees engaged in interstate commerce or in the production of goods for interstate commerce be compensated at rates not less than one and one-half times the regular rates at which they are employed for all hours worked in excess of 44 per week during the first year after October 24, 1938, in…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Swift & Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
- Walling v. A. H. Belo Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Shepler v. Crucible Fuel Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1944
- Fleming v. Mason & Dixon Lines, Inc.District Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1941
- Walling v. Alabama Pipe Co.District Court, W.D. Missouri · 1942
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Walling v. Halliburton Oil Well Cementing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Walling v. Halliburton Oil Well Cementing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947