Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Sandaker v. Olson

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided April 9, 1935No. File No. 6320PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBurr, J.

The petitioner seeks to mandamus the state auditing board to approve and allow his vouchers for salary as assistant dairy commissioner during the months of July to December, 1933, inclusive, and the state auditor to issue warrants in payment of the same. The vouchers were disapproved and warrants denied on the ground that there is no legislative appropriation made to pay the salary; that the legislature, by chapter 16 of the Session Laws of 1933, made an ap propriation for salary for the biennium but this item was vetoed by the governor. The district court denied the writ and petitioner…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. BarnettSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1901
  2. Woodall v. DarstWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1912
  3. State ex rel. McCue v. BlaisdellNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1909
  4. May v. ToppingWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1909
  5. Fairfield v. FosterArizona Supreme Court · 1923

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Link v. OlsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1979
  2. State Ex Rel. Dickson v. SaizNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1957
  3. Cenarrusa v. AndrusIdaho Supreme Court · 1978
  4. State Ex Rel. Martin v. ZimmermanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1939
  5. State Ex Rel. Olson v. WelfordNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1935

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API