State Ex Rel. Martin v. Zimmerman
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtMartin, J.
The defendant contends, (1) that the power of partial veto does not exist after the legislature has adjourned sine die, and (2) that, if the governor has such veto power, the exercise of it in the instant case so changed the legislative program or policy as to render the parts approved invalid.
These contentions necessitate a construction of sec. 10, art. V, of the Wisconsin constitution (which is printed in the margin). 1
In State ex rel. Martin, v. Zimmerman, ante, p. 16, 288 N. W. 454, the court said (p. 20) :
“We do not need to consider in this case acts of the legislature which become laws…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- State ex rel. Wisconsin Telephone Co. v. HenryWisconsin Supreme Court · 1935
- May v. ToppingWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1909
- State Ex Rel. Martin v. ZimmermanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1939
- Carter v. RathburnSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1922
- State Ex Rel. Sandaker v. OlsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1935
3Cited by27 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Wisconsin Senate v. ThompsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1988
- State Ex Rel. Sundby v. AdamanyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1976
- State Ex Rel. Kleczka v. ContaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1978
- Citizens Utility Board v. KlauserWisconsin Supreme Court · 1995
- Management Council of the Wyoming Legislature v. GeringerWyoming Supreme Court · 1998
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.