Legal Opinion

Austin Chevrolet, Inc. v. Motor Vehicle Board & Motor Vehicle Division of the Texas Department of Transportation

Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)

Decided September 19, 2006No. 03-05-00355-CVPublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

JAN P. PATTERSON, Justice.

This is an appeal from a final order issued by the Motor Vehicle Board of the Texas Department of Transportation 1 in a Subaru proceeding. 2 See Subaru of Am., Inc. v. David McDavid Nissan, Inc., 84 S.W.3d 212, 226 (Tex.2002). In this case, Landmark Chevrolet Corporation (Landmark) filed a lawsuit against General Motors Corporation (GM) and Austin Chevrolet, Inc., d/b/a Munday Chevrolet/Geo (Munday) (together “GM/Munday”), alleging that GM defrauded Landmark out of its right to protest 3 Munday’s dealership application in 1993 and discriminated against…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Butnaru v. Ford Motor Co.Texas Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Subaru of America, Inc. v. David McDavid Nissan, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 2002
  3. H.G. Sledge, Inc. v. Prospective Investment & Trading Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2000
  4. Lewis v. Metropolitan Savings & Loan Ass'nTexas Supreme Court · 1977
  5. State v. CrankTexas Supreme Court · 1984

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Cadena Comercial USA Corp. D/B/A Oxxo v. Texas Alcoholic Beverage CommissionTexas Supreme Court · 2017
  2. Beck Chevrolet Co. v. General Motors LLCCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2015
  3. Texas Logos, L.P. v. Brinkmeyer, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2008
  4. Texas State Board of Pharmacy v. WitcherCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2014
  5. APOLLO ENTERPRISES, INC. v. ScripNet, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2009

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API