Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Clark v. Brown

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided March 10, 1965No. 38911PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtZimmerman, J.

One question is raised by this action, viz., the validity of Section 4710.02, Revised Code, which prohibits the business of debt pooling unless such business was duly licensed by a political subdivision of the state prior to January 1, 1958, the effective date of the statute.

Relators base their attack on this section on two grounds. It is contended, first, that it violates the due process clauses of the Constitutions of the United States and of the state of Ohio by depriving them of their right to engage in a legitimate business and, second, that it violates the equal protection clauses of…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Ferguson v. SkrupaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Allied Stores of Ohio, Inc. v. BowersSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  3. Hall v. Geiger-Jones Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1917
  4. Purity Extract & Tonic Co. v. LynchSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  5. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. GrosjeanSupreme Court of the United States · 1937

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Phung v. Waste Management, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1986
  2. State v. RushOhio Supreme Court · 1998
  3. State v. RushOhio Supreme Court · 1998
  4. DeLozier v. SommerOhio Supreme Court · 1974
  5. Bouquett v. Ohio State Medical BoardOhio Court of Appeals · 1997

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API