Legal Opinion
State of Minnesota v. Forrest Grant Noggle
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided July 6, 2016No. A15-466PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ANDERSON, .Justice.
Appellant Forrest Grant Noggle was convicted of attempted third-degree criminal sexual conduct. Minn,Stat. § 609.17 (2014); see Minn.Stat. § 609.344, subd. 1(b) (2014). After Noggle violated the terms of his probation, the district court sentenced him to 18 months in prison and imposed a 10-year conditional-release term under Minn.Stat. § 609.3455, subd. 6 (2014). The sole issue on appeal is whether section 609.3455, subdivision 6, authorizes a 10-year conditional-release term for the crime of attempted third-degree criminal sexual conduct. We hold that it does not.…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- State v. OlkonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
- Premier Bank v. BECKER DEVELOPMENT, LLCSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2010
- State v. VangSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2014
- State v. KoppiSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2011
- State v. MaurstadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2007
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- State v. BoeckerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2017
- Browder v. StateCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2017
- Thong v. StateCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2017
- Andrew Henry Lieberman v. State of MinnesotaCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2024
- Fidel Pizarro-Rios v. State of MinnesotaCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2025
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.