Thong v. State
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HOOTEN, Judge
In this appeal from the denial of his motion for postconviction relief, appellant argues that the postconviction court erred by concluding that the disti’ict court, when revoking appellant’s probation and executing his sentence, had the authority to impose a conditional-release period not made part of his previously imposed but stayed sentence. We affirm.
FACTS
In December 2012, appellant Peter Reat Thong was charged by complaint with one count of first-degree driving while impaired (DWI). On May 23, 2013, Thong first entered a not guilty plea, but later that same day…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Roby v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1996
- Perkins v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1997
- Butala v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2003
- State v. IversonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2003
- State v. WukawitzSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2003
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- State v. PriggeCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2017